Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. These executions have been performed through electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, firing squad, and the most common lethal injection, which over people have been executed by this method. However, only eighteen out of the fifty states have abolished the death penalty. I believe the death penalty does not solve the crime, teach a lesson, or answer any problems that were caused by the crime.
Use an editor to spell check essay. True, on paper the plan looks very good, but it will not work. It is true that innocent people have been executed, but that number is minuscule compared to the amount of "true" criminals that are rightfully executed.
There is step procedure necessary before any person can be given a death sentence. By having the process consist of numerous steps and involving many different people, human error is greatly reduced.
The death penalty is not racially or gender bias, much to the contrary of what the affirmative team believes. The fact is that men commit more crimes, so they will be convicted at a greater rate then women.
The ratio of men to women on death row and executed is Frommen committed 7 times as many murders as women or a 7: Therefore, it may be statically shown that men are, by a Like gender bias, racial bias is nonexistent in the rulings involving the death penalty.
The death penalty is not bias to any race, but by just looking at the numbers it may seem that it is. The total populations of each race will give the illusion of bias, but that is not true. The affirmative side also argues that the cost of life in prison without parole is much cheaper then the cost of the death penalty, but this, like their charge of bias, is also untrue.
No one team can give impartial numbers since studies by both sides are bias. There is no need for change because the current system is working just fine. Why fix something that is not broken.
The death penalty deters crime. Houston had the highest murder rate inwith murders. InTexas resumed executions. Since then Houston has executed more murderers than any other city or state, except Texas, and has seen the greatest reduction in murder.
The city went from murders to murders in a year span. The innocents, the-would-be victims were saved from a harsh death by the death penalty that supposedly did not work. An econometric study from indicated that each execution deters 8 or more murders. That is the goal of the death penalty, not to get revenge on the criminal, but to prevent more crimes of the same nature form occurring.
Execution equals deterrent, which ultimately leads to prevention. If a convicted murderer is put into prison for life without parole, that person is given another chance to kill again. What will happen if that person kills again in prison or even if they escape and kill again?
According to the affirmative side, that person will be put back into prison and given another chance to kill. If the death penalty would have been imposed that person would have never had the second chance. Again the death penalty prevents. The death penalty is not cruel and unusual because most states favor the lethal injection, which is not cruel in anyway.
It is true that botched executions do occur, but like innocents that are executed, it is rare. What about the victim, who was killed, was it fair for them to die and suffer?
The victim was murdered for no reason, while the murderer would be executed for no reason. If one is going to break the law, they must be prepared to face that same law down the road.
Why should any citizen be allowed to wrong the laws of this great country and not have to face the same fate as their victim? By not imposing the death penalty it is an insult to society and the victim.
The death penalty needs minor repairs, which include being more consistent and lower the number of appeals allowed.This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue.
I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the.
The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay For instance, the case of Kirk Bloodsworth sent to death row in based on false eye witness evidence. He was . Some of people start thinking that the death penalty should be abolished.
Moreover, there are contrary opinions to judge the issue of the death penalty. In my opinion, .
This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue.
I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the. Death penalty should be abolished.
Every year, thousands of people are put on death row for a crime they didn't even commit. There's no way of knowing if they actually did or not. The death penalty is the harshest possible punishment to receive.
It is only used for the worst of crimes and criminals. It is important for preserving law and order, deterring crime, and keeping.